Daily Archives: January 7, 2013

Do You Like Seafood? You Might Want To Check This – Infographic

Seafood was sampled from 81 retail outlets in NYC, the DNA of seafood was tested, where at least one mislabeled item was found 39% of the time. Surprisingly (not), it doesn’t look much better in other locations.

Source: Visual.ly

nyc-fish-fraud_50eaf4b891958

New York City, Brooklyn Bridge, Wall Painting

©TheMainStreetAnalyst

The Self-Driving, Ultra-Connected Car Of The Future – Infographic

What will the car of the future look like? Will it drive itself and communicate with other vehicles in order to avoid traffic accidents? Will it be loaded with advanced sensors and have greatly reduced emissions compared to today’s cars?

In the infographic below, the folks from InsuranceQuotes try to imagine the car of tomorrow, taking these and other likely possibilities into account. No matter which technologies are used, the car of the future is likely to be smarter, safer and more efficient. Check out how it compares to today’s cars.

Source: Mashable.com

car of the future

Image courtesy of InsuranceQuotes

5 Marketing Predictions for 2013

5 Marketing Predictions for 2013.

There was certainly no shortage of big developments in the marketing world throughout 2012. Facebook created a massive mobile advertising business in less than year, Red Bull literally financed a trip into the stratosphere to create powerful branded content, and a YouTube video finally hit 1 billion views, showing the potential reach for online videos.

So what might 2013 bring for marketers? We contacted several advertising experts and reviewed recent studies and business trends to come up with five marketing predictions for the coming year.

Advertisers Pursue Mobile-First Strategy

Image courtesy of Flickr, BuzzFarmers

Mobile advertising exploded in 2012, with eMarketer projecting in December that U.S. mobile ad spend would nearly triple to $4 billion for the year. Much of this growth is due to Facebook and Google, both experiencing huge growth in revenue from their mobile ad products in 2012. Facebook, in particular, announced its first mobile ad product — Sponsored Stories in mobile News Feeds — in February, and now generates more than $3 million per day from mobile ads.

As these platforms continue to improve their ad formats for marketers this year — and consumers continue to spend more time and money on mobile devices — advertising spend on mobile will only continue to skyrocket. In fact, eMarketer expects mobile ads to increasingly become the top priority for advertisers on digital, rather than desktop.

“For many years, you had marketers emphasizing a build-for-the-desktop-first approach, and similarly you had a lot of advertising publishers and platforms that developed their products for the desktop,” said Clark Fredricksen, VP of communications for eMarketer. “Now we are seeing more people build for mobile first with the desktop as the second priority.”

Brands and Publishers Re-Think Banner Ads

Image courtesy of espn.go.com

Banner ads are easy to hate: they have lousy click-through rates and typically don’t translate well from desktop to mobile. Several people we spoke with in the advertising industry predicted that marketers will be devoting less and less of their budgets on these display ads, but even they admit that the banner ad isn’t going away for good anytime soon. In the interim, some brands and publishers are trying to come up with new and creative ways to innovate on banner ads, rather than just write them off.

On Friday, ESPN.com debuted an interactive banner ad (seen above) that prompts visitors to vote on which of two teams will win an upcoming college football game. The ESPN ad then changes color depending on which team is leading in the polls. ESPN isn’t the first to tweak the traditional banner ad. IKEA launched a clever promotion in April that squeezed all 2,800 of the store’s products into a tiny 300X250 pixel banner ad and let users scroll over and zoom in on different items. More recently, Gucci experimented with banner ads that could be pinned directly to Pinterest.

This isn’t likely to stop the overall shift away from banner ads, but these efforts show there is still room for innovation. Or, as IAB president and CEO Randall Rothenberg put it in an interview with Mashable, “People look at shitty banner ads and think the problem is the banner ads. The problem is shitty advertising.”

Native Advertising Starts to Replace Traditional Display Ads

Image courtesy of Mashable

Native advertising has turned into an amorphous buzz word that means different things to different people, but at the most basic level, this phrase simply refers to ads that are delivered in-stream and integrated as seamlessly as possible into the core user experience. These ads took off in 2012 and will increasingly become the preferred form of display advertising in the coming year.

“If 2012 proved anything in mobile, it proved that the ad publishers using so-called native formats are able to deliver much more effectively with mobile devices and in essence are able to overcome the historical disadvantages of display advertising on a small screen,” Fredricksen said. “We are seeing a dramatic upswing and we expect that to continue.”

Facebook and Twitter applied this formula with great success in 2012 by inserting sponsored posts into their respective streams on mobile devices. Many publishers, including Mashable, have expanded their own native advertising options for mobile and the web by letting advertisers create ad units that appear in the stream of content published on the website. In fact, a recent survey found that a third of publishers are “likely or very likely” to add a native advertising option to their websites.

Looking Beyond The Total Number of Likes

Image courtesy of Facebook, Coca Cola

Having more fans or followers on social networks doesn’t necessarily mean having greater engagement; in fact some recent studies suggest that the opposite is often the case.

Napkin Labs, a Facebook app developer, analyzed the pages for 50 brands with between 200,000-1 million likes each, and found that just 6% of fans engaged with their Facebook Pages on average. What’s more, those pages with at least 900,000 fans actually had 60% less engagement than those pages with 500,000-600,000 fans. Likewise, Sling Digital, a Twitter ad optimization service, analyzed accounts for all Fortune 100 companies active on the social network, and found that engagement tended to drop off for brands with more followers.

That doesn’t mean brands can’t and shouldn’t aspire to accumulating a strong following, but it does mean more brands will have to re-focus their emphasis on engagement metrics beyond the number of likes and followers.

“Every business has to measure what they do and make sure that it is effective,” Riley Gibson, the co-founder and CEO of Napkin Labs, told Mashable in a previous interview. “Likes can be part of that measurement, but we need to start looking beyond that a bit, and start looking in more depth at what fans are actually doing.”

Relying More on Big Data As A Marketing Tool

Image courtesy of Flickr, Images_of_Money

One of the biggest lessons for marketers from the presidential election in November is just how powerful a tool big data can be.

Several companies have launched in recent years to offer tools to help provide data analysis to brands and marketers, including BloomReach which provides brands with big data to help with SEO and Swipe.ly which helps retailers analyze their sales and social data to understand trends with their business. These and other tools will change the way companies think about marketing and running their business.

“Big data is really emerging as a key currency in marketing,” Fredricksen said. “Increasingly, we are seeing more companies use big data and analytics to drive customer insights, create their budgets and to manage operations, the supply chain, customer support, product strategy and pricing.”

Image courtesy of Flickr, bark.

Source: Mashable.com

Is Social Media A New Designer Drug? – Infographic

This just in: People really like using social media to interact. Oh wait, you probably already knew that. In fact, you’re probably one of those people.

To put it in perspective, there are about 7 billion people on the planet. Facebook signed up one billion users in slightly more than eight years of existence.

Have you ever wondered why these sites are so popular? As with any observable global phenomenon, scientists and researchers have been furiously trying to answer that very question. At first glance, some of the results seem shocking.

Read also on The Main Street Analyst:

For instance, a survey conducted by the University of Chicago Booth School of Business concluded that resisting the urge to use social media is tougher than resisting the urge to sleep or have sex. Granted, there is often little reason to resist, because it takes minimal effort to check Facebook or Twitter.

However, there appear to be physiological forces driving social media use. According to Harvard University research, self-disclosure spurs the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with rewarding feelings. The same study cites research that found 80% of social media posts are self-reflective, compared to 30-40% of speech during verbal conversation.

So just like Twizzlers “make mouths happy,” Twitter makes brains happy.

The infographic below, created by Online College Courses, summarizes some of the shocking findings about the addictive nature of social media usage.

Are we actually crazy for social media, or are there lurking variables at play? Continue the discussion in the comments section below.

Source: Mashable.com

Social-Media-Brain-Infographic

Do You Believe What Advertising Is Promissing? – Infographic

Apparently consumers are taking this old saying to heart: “Believe only half of what you see and nothing that you hear.” Market research firm Lab42 just released a study that revealed that 76% of its respondents think advertisements contain exaggerated claims, and a mere 3% think ads are “very accurate.”

According to Lab42’s survey of 500 respondents, while 38% wish for more accuracy in advertising, only 17% would like to see more laws in the United States that regulate advertising. In the U.S., advertising is seen as free speech, but that’s not the case in other countries such as the UK, where ads are routinely banned for being misleading or exaggerated.

With the Super Bowl coming up in the U.S., which is not only the most important football game of the year but the most important advertising spree as well, you’ll notice advertisers are already fully aware that humor enhances memorability of a product. As you’ll see in the infographic below, Lab42’s results reinforce that, where 71% of the respondents agree that making them laugh makes them remember as well.

One surprising result was that only 8% of the respondents thought sexy ads made a product more memorable. But not surprisingly, 92% of that group were men. You’ll certainly recognize the way the respondents believed men and women are portrayed in ads, with men often characterized as sports-obsessed, womanizing and idiotic, while women are stereotypically depicted as shopping-obsessed, family-oriented and promiscuous. No wonder so many people are turned off by ads.

Let us know in the comments which ads you’ve found the least believable or annoying. How about the ones that were the least memorable? Or have you forgotten them already?

Source: Infographic courtesy Lab42, Mashable.com

adperception